Skip to content
RippleXn

The method

From a live problem to a qualified deployment.

Most monitoring starts with a device and hopes a question turns up. We start with the question and work backwards. It is a slower beginning and a much shorter ending.

01

Define

What must be established?

Before a single instrument is chosen, we agree the question. Who will ask it, when, and to what standard. A regulator, an insurer, a board and a neighbour all want the same event explained, but they do not accept the same answer. Getting this wrong is the most expensive mistake in monitoring, and the most common.

02

Design

Which evidence sources are required?

We work backwards from the question to the sources. Physical measurement, operational activity, weather and dispersion, human reports, and the record of what you did in response. Some of it you already hold. Some of it needs to be captured. Some of it will never be recoverable, and it is better to know that now.

03

Deploy

Connect proven monitoring technology.

RippleXn designs and manages deployments using specialist instrumentation partners, and connects the instrumentation required by the question. Existing systems are used where they are adequate. Any material commercial relationship is disclosed, and the evidence standard does not change according to who made the instrument.

04

Explain

Deliver one clear chronology.

Fragments become an account. What changed, when, what else was happening, who noticed, what you did, and how quickly. Written so a non-specialist can follow it and a specialist can trace, test and challenge each conclusion. That is the product. Everything before it is preparation.

Five streams. One account.

Every organisation already holds part of the answer. The part it holds is rarely the part it is asked for.

PHYSICALOPERATIONALHUMANONE CHRONOLOGY

What a qualified deployment can produce.

A factual chronology

What happened, in order, with the source of every entry.

Anomalies, named

What departed from the expected pattern, and by how much.

Source consistency

Where independent records agree, and where they do not.

The gaps

What could not be established, stated plainly rather than glossed.

Your response, recorded

What you knew, when you knew it, and what you did next.

Documentation that travels

Written for the audience that will actually read it.

Instrument-independent architecture with disclosed commercial relationships.

The question chooses the instrument. Ten questions will show you how much of your own event you could still explain.

Start here

What happened here? Ask the Black Box.

Start by testing what your current evidence could explain.